Excel At Life--Dedicated to the Pursuit of Excellence in Life, Relationships, Sports and Career
CBT Jealousy Depression Relationships Conflict Self-efficacy Happiness Goal-setting Motivation Wellness Sport Psych

Popular Articles

Crazy-Makers: Dealing with Passive-Aggressive People

Why Are People Mean? Don't Take It Personally!

When You Have Been Betrayed

Struggling to Forgive: An Inability to Grieve

Happy Habits: 50 Suggestions

The Secret of Happiness: Let It Find You (But Make the Effort)

Excellence vs. Perfection

Depression is Not Sadness

20 Steps to Better Self-Esteem

7 Rules and 8 Methods for Responding to Passive-aggressive People

What to Do When Your Jealousy Threatens to Destroy Your Marriage

Happiness is An Attitude

Guide to How to Set Achieveable Goals

Catastrophe? Or Inconvenience?

Popular Audios

Panic Assistance

Motivational Audios

Mindfulness Training

Rational Thinking

Relaxation for Children

Loving Kindness Meditation

Self-Esteem Exercise

Lies You Were Told

Choosing Happiness

Audio Version of Article: Crazy-Makers: Passive-Aggressive People

Audio Version of Article: Why Are People Mean? Don't Take It Personally!

Audio Version of Article: Happiness Is An Attitude

All Audio Articles

PsychNotes Index

More PsychNotes: Policies and Issues in Mental Health

May 31, 2016       
print

The Influence of News Commentators
by Monica A. Frank, PhD

news
How much are people influenced by news commentators' opinions? What if it is clearly stated as an opinion and not based on evidence?

Why does this matter? When people trust the source of their news they may be more influenced by those opinions. If people accept news commentators opinions as fact then they may change health behaviors unwisely. Sometimes this could be harmful.

For instance, when news sources reported on a study in 2015 indicating that saturated fats were not linked to higher risk of heart disease, one major news source included a sidebar saying “Eat more butter.” This statement was a false representation of the researchers' conclusions. However, such a prominent statement accompanied by a research source makes it more believable to the public. Not only that but many people only read a headline and the sidebar. This type of advice could endanger some people.

Researchers Amber Gaffney and colleagues (2016) questioned: “If people have trouble distinguishing whether Colbert is a serious newsman, whether Dr. Oz is providing an opinion supported by scientific testing or mere paid endorsement, do they understand when people such as Bill O’Reilly and Rachel Maddow are simply giving their opinion rather than giving a researched and educated interpretation of the news? Do they know to question when news reports make health recommendations without all of the facts?”

To find out, they conducted an experiment in which they presented a news segment from 20/20 that had been doctored to provide biased evidence regarding the common cold. Some people were told at the end of the segment that it was opinion and others told that it was based on research. The results showed it didn't matter if people were warned that the segment was opinion. Under both conditions they were more likely to change their opinion to agree with the commentator.


How can the public not be unduly influenced by opinions when they are constantly bombarded by TV, internet news sources, and social media? It is doubtful the public can be protected because it is human nature to be swayed by a trusted source.

As an individual, however, you can choose to be more skeptical of what you read or hear. Personally, I find the influence can be so powerful that the best protection is to avoid watching or reading anything I believe is from a biased source.

I probably should clarify, though, since just about everything is biased in some way. For instance, when I choose what to write about in my PsychNotes, it is based on my own biases and agenda. Even though I might consider that agenda benevolent, others may not.

Therefore, who you choose to listen to is not about whether you will be influenced but about how you want to be influenced.

Gaffney, A.M., Tomory, J.J., Gold, G.J. (2016). The Endorsement of Commentator Opinion: A Case of Manufactured Consent? Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5, 194–202. DOI: 10.1037/ppm0000057


Kindle Books by
Dr. Monica Frank



Recent Articles

Analyzing Your Moods, Symptoms, and Events with Excel At Life's Mood Log

Why You Get Anxious When You Don't Want To

Why People Feel Grief at the Loss of an Abusive Spouse or Parent

“Are You Depressed?”: Understanding Diagnosis and Treatment

15 Coping Statements for Panic and Anxiety

Beyond Tolerating Emotions: Becoming Comfortable with Discomfort

Emotion Training: What is it and How Does it Work?

How You Can Be More Resistant to Workplace Bullying

Are You Passive Aggressive and Want to Change?

When Your Loved One Refuses Help

Newest Audios

Building Blocks Emotion Training

Hot Springs Relaxation

5 Methods to Managing Anger

Panic Assistance While Driving

Autogenic Relaxation Training

Rainbow Sandbox Mindfulness

Mindfulness Training