Excel At Life--Dedicated to the Pursuit of Excellence in Life, Relationships, Sports and Career
CBT Jealousy Depression Relationships Conflict Self-efficacy Happiness Goal-setting Motivation Wellness Sport Psych

Popular Articles

Crazy-Makers: Dealing with Passive-Aggressive People

Why Are People Mean? Don't Take It Personally!

When You Have Been Betrayed

Struggling to Forgive: An Inability to Grieve

Happy Habits: 50 Suggestions

The Secret of Happiness: Let It Find You (But Make the Effort)

Excellence vs. Perfection

Depression is Not Sadness

20 Steps to Better Self-Esteem

7 Rules and 8 Methods for Responding to Passive-aggressive People

What to Do When Your Jealousy Threatens to Destroy Your Marriage

Happiness is An Attitude

Guide to How to Set Achieveable Goals

Catastrophe? Or Inconvenience?

Popular Audios

Panic Assistance

Motivational Audios

Mindfulness Training

Rational Thinking

Relaxation for Children

Loving Kindness Meditation

Self-Esteem Exercise

Lies You Were Told

Choosing Happiness

Audio Version of Article: Crazy-Makers: Passive-Aggressive People

Audio Version of Article: Why Are People Mean? Don't Take It Personally!

Audio Version of Article: Happiness Is An Attitude

All Audio Articles

PsychNotes Index

More PsychNotes: Communication

June 13, 2016       
print

When Emotional Reasoning Interferes With Having a Dialog About Micro-aggressions
by Monica A. Frank, PhD

one car saying to another "That hurts!"--the other responds "You're too sensitive!"
People have become polarized on the topic of micro-aggressions. In case you aren't familiar with micro-aggressions, the term refers to attitudes, behaviors, and comments that are hurtful and discriminatory but may be too subtle to clearly identify. Read my article 5 Common Micro-aggressions Against Those With Mental Illness for additional description.

Instead of looking reasonably at the issue and finding the common middle ground, this polarization causes people on both sides of the issue to react more aggressively.

On one side is: “This is ridiculous! People are too sensitive! I can't be aware of every subtle thing I do that could offend someone.”

On the other side is: “People choose to be unaware of their bigotry and hurtful behavior. They should be punished and maybe they'll be more careful.”

Instead, as I often preach, the answer is somewhere in the middle. Micro-aggression is a very real problem but people can go too far in their expectations. People do need to be more aware of how subtle behaviors and comments can be hurtful. However, the victims of micro-aggression need to examine their expectations of others and rather than being accusatory they might focus on educating people about micro-aggressions and developing more compassion.

Unfortunately, accusations and blame tend to create more polarization. People on both sides use the irrational thought process of emotional reasoning to justify their position. The emotional reasoning style of thinking is “If I feel something, it must be true.” Instead of evaluating an emotion for accuracy a person automatically accepts it as valid.

However, just because someone feels something doesn't make it true. For instance, sometimes we have certain emotional reactions due to past experiences that trigger a reaction in a similar, but not the same, situation. So if a person was sexually violated, that person may feel violated when someone brings up the topic of rape in a classroom. Or, if someone was mugged at gunpoint they may feel threatened by someone's discussion of gun rights. However, in these instances, the person was not violated by the discussion even though the emotion of violation was triggered.

On the other hand, when a person feels blamed and shamed by a discussion about micro-aggressions it doesn't mean that person has been targeted as bigoted or evil. It's possible the discussion might be about developing more awareness and compassion for people, not about trying to blame or control behavior. Their emotional reaction may be due to protecting the self-concept and not about any personal attack. Most people want to feel good about themselves so they try to protect themselves from seeing that their behavior might be hurtful.

So, to have a discussion on this topic (as is true of many topics) people need to move beyond the emotional reaction. The best way to do this is to examine your own emotional reaction. People are often good at examining others' reactions and telling others they are unreasonable and emotional. However, that is not effective for resolution of a problem. Alternatively, by identifying when you are reacting with emotional reasoning you can begin to listen and understand the other's point of view. In this way people can become less polarized and a reasonable discussion of micro-aggressions can ensue.

Kindle Books by
Dr. Monica Frank



Recent Articles

Analyzing Your Moods, Symptoms, and Events with Excel At Life's Mood Log

Why You Get Anxious When You Don't Want To

Why People Feel Grief at the Loss of an Abusive Spouse or Parent

“Are You Depressed?”: Understanding Diagnosis and Treatment

15 Coping Statements for Panic and Anxiety

Beyond Tolerating Emotions: Becoming Comfortable with Discomfort

Emotion Training: What is it and How Does it Work?

How You Can Be More Resistant to Workplace Bullying

Are You Passive Aggressive and Want to Change?

When Your Loved One Refuses Help

Newest Audios

Building Blocks Emotion Training

Hot Springs Relaxation

5 Methods to Managing Anger

Panic Assistance While Driving

Autogenic Relaxation Training

Rainbow Sandbox Mindfulness

Mindfulness Training